🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation may be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to pass a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," said one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the family of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and fit for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the local government level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to copy this example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world agencies take a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of this nation and its followers show that policymakers around the world are less and less content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.